Foldit Wiki
Register
(Adding categories)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
To see the [http://predictioncenter.org/download_area/CASPROL/server_predictions/ server predictions] , use [http://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/ PyMOL] , [http://jmol.sourceforge.net/index.en.html Jmol] or [http://depts.washington.edu/uwc4c/express-licenses/assets/foldit/ foldit alone version].
 
To see the [http://predictioncenter.org/download_area/CASPROL/server_predictions/ server predictions] , use [http://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/ PyMOL] , [http://jmol.sourceforge.net/index.en.html Jmol] or [http://depts.washington.edu/uwc4c/express-licenses/assets/foldit/ foldit alone version].
   
[http://de.foldit.wikia.com/wiki/CASP_ROLL Table ] of all puzzles and natives.
+
[http://de.foldit.wikia.com/wiki/CASP_ROLL Table ] of all puzzles and natives. ''(German foldit wiki)''
   
 
The result of puzzles previous to casp10 was published.
 
The result of puzzles previous to casp10 was published.

Revision as of 08:20, 23 December 2014

CASP the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction, is a bi-annual worldwide experiment for protein structure prediction, held since 1994.

CASP Official siteCASP page on Wikipedia

CASP 11 (2014)

CASP 11 Rankings

- Foldit CASP11 Category scoreboard
- Puzzle Results Images of CASP11 puzzle solutions from the players
- Detailed CASP11 info and scoreboards on the German wiki (in German)
- CASP 11 Official siteand Target List which will have relevant PDB codes as they become available.

CASP Roll

CASP Roll web page: http://predictioncenter.org/casprol/index.cgi

The rolling experiment will run all year round.

To see the server predictions , use PyMOL , Jmol or foldit alone version.

Table of all puzzles and natives. (German foldit wiki)

The result of puzzles previous to casp10 was published.

Foldit results

All Results

CASP10

CASP10 web page: http://predictioncenter.org/casp10/index.cgi

Timeline:

  • The  prediction targets are released
  • the last prediction targets have been released in July 17, 2012
  • prediction season end July 31, 2012
  • Refinement experiment end in August 17, 2012
  • Abstracts describing the methods tested in CASP10 have been collected in September 2012
  • The meeting  take place on December 9-12, 2012

see table of all puzzles

see some statitics

see some results of Foldit players

blog entries: CASP10 update (2012/09)

Group performance on all models #101 Foldit, #124 AD, #127 Contenders, #140 VC

Group performance on first model #116 Foldit, #120 VC, #123 AD, #126 Contenders

WeFold results : WeFold  wfFUIK, (Foldit participating in the WeFold CASP 10 project )

Mini-CASP

In early August of 2009, the foldit developers decided to give the players starting models outputted from Rosetta@home, by obtaining sequences for proteins that were currently unsolved, but would be released to the Protein Data Bank soon after. Since no one knew which structure predictions would be correct, they tried to give the players as diverse a set as possible.

The intent was practice for everyone for the upcoming CASP9, and to help the developers figure out what the best Rosetta models would be to use as starting points for Foldit. (taken from Dr. Baker's Mini CASP announcement http://fold.it/portal/node/986632)

CASP9

Information from CASP 9 is on its own page.

CASP8

Foldit was represented for the first time at the eighth competition (CASP8) which took place during 2008, but in that competition FoldIt results were part of the BakerLab CASP team. In preparation the players had folded old CASP7 proteins and compared the results from the developers with the published structures.

The first open beta of FoldIt was released a few days after the start of CASP8[1]. The players and developers then spent a month training and developing the program further before trying their hand at their first CASP8 puzzle[2]. As a result, they were only involved in relatively few competition targets. Despite these handicaps the FoldIt team did well with some top places and even a victory! Overall, the Foldit players were as good as the experts with all their tools and better than any automated machine submissions[3].


Literature

Building the Scientific - bild der wissenschaft edition: 4 / 2010, page 18 - Perfectly shaped - Article on Protein Structure Prediction and CASP

Sources